Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-5927539-20160322225122/@comment-4588264-20160323022250

Bridgetterocks wrote: Cartoon44 wrote: Sorry for the late response guys! I don't have any problems with the rule, and a cleaning the wiki up seems only right. I can definitely pitch in tomorrow. In other ways of dealing with this, perhaps we establish a new system. Here's a suggestion:

If the owner of a project is labeled active, but has not touched their articles in a long period of time (judgment is all that is needed), they can recieve 2 weeks to respond to a warning message, asking them to return to activity or give up the ownership of their projects.

If the owner of a project is labeled inactive, we give them 1 week to respond to a message on their wall, with the same message as before.

If the user does not respond, and does not take action, we delete the pages for unwanted space.

A new idea, however, is ownership claim. My idea is that all users must put an ownership claim category on their pages, preventing them from getting adopted when the user goes inactive, and rather deleted. All pages without ownership claim are eligble for being put up for adoption. We'd give it quite a bit of time for users to adjust to this new rule, say a time of several months. With this, it makes the option easy if the user does not respond. Either put up for adoption, or delete. I agree with it, but I can't go back and put the ownership claim in all my 120 A! Episodes + YA ones. I can do it on the main projects like the Assemble! and Marvel's Young Avengers pages, but not in all of them, and I wouldn't ask someone else to do it either. Yeah, not all the pages of the wiki, but perhaps on the main project pages. My idea is that given enough amount of time, and then we take action when necessary. The main purpose is that it makes it a lot easier for deletion purposes.