Talk:Riley Tilman (Earth-420)/@comment-6548012-20151127000225/@comment-6548012-20151127011212

The synthezoid thing really never made too much sense to me. But that's alright, you can't just expect to come out with a scientifically valid hypothesis on how to make computers feel. Also, that doesn't make sense, if computers don't feel, they don't feel that they don't feel. Can't believe I'm hurting my brain so much here, but again, I see what you mean, it's just the phrasing that doesn't really work, once again, because it's really important&mdash;yet people tend to have troubles with quotes.

The whole martial arts thing doesn't mean anything, realy. Sorry to be that harsh on it, but, yeah. If you go by the fact that machines don't make mistakes, then, they shouldn't feel. Because feelings lead to mistakes, after all, what made HAL 9000 so good? That's right. He was cold as hell, yet he was always right. And again, you can't just copy a move, there is a spiritual opening to make there, something that a computer cannot understand, and also, “copying a move” demands initiative, which as the universe's logic states, she hasn't any. Let me explain my point. To grasp the concept of a martial art, one must accept two things: Kill anything that might stand before them, and military virtues. That's how they work. But from the universe's logic, robots can feel, yes, but not understand concepts. These go farther than just fact. It's also philosophical, and philosophical is a science most impossible to anything that isn't human. One close friend of mine has a saying going on: “At the moment we shake hands, there are only so many ways I've found to kill you.” This involves two things, once again: calculation (what the machine could do) and, encore, initiative (what machines can never do, in this reality.) If you were in front of me, I could explain easily, but through the Internet, it's gonna be much harder.