Board Thread:Administrative/@comment-5927539-20160322225122/@comment-4588264-20160323021618

Sorry for the late response guys! I don't have any problems with the rule, and a cleaning the wiki up seems only right. I can definitely pitch in tomorrow. In other ways of dealing with this, perhaps we establish a new system. Here's a suggestion:

If the owner of a project is labeled active, but has not touched their articles in a long period of time (judgment is all that is needed), they can recieve 2 weeks to respond to a warning message, asking them to return to activity or give up the ownership of their projects.

If the owner of a project is labeled inactive, we give them 1 week to respond to a message on their wall, with the same message as before.

If the user does not respond, and does not take action, we delete the pages for unwanted space.

A new idea, however, is ownership claim. My idea is that all users must put an ownership claim category on their pages, preventing them from getting adopted when the user goes inactive, and rather deleted. All pages without ownership claim are eligble for being put up for adoption. We'd give it quite a bit of time for users to adjust to this new rule, say a time of several months. With this, it makes the option easy if the user does not respond. Either put up for adoption, or delete.